The Effect of Task Based Language Teaching on Students' WTC and Speaking Ability through Paired-Work vs. Cooperative Instructions

Chegini, Milad

doi:10.22034/ijpie.2023.179563

The Effect of Task Based Language Teaching on Students' WTC and Speaking Ability through Paired-Work vs. Cooperative Instructions

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Milad Chegini

English Language Department, Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran

10.22034/ijpie.2023.179563

Abstract

This study concerned with the effect of cooperative and paired-work task-based instructions on EFL learners’ speaking ability and willingness to communicate. To this end, sixty male intermediate learners in a language school participated in the experimental study for 12 sessions. The participants were assigned to cooperative group (N=30) and paired-work group (N=30). After making sure about the homogeneity of the two groups, WTC questionnaire and the PET speaking test were administered to both groups as a pretest. The instructions used in this study were all adapted from Task-based Language Teaching. At the end of the experiment, the same WTC questionnaire and the PET speaking test were again administered as the posttest. Then the researcher compared the results of pre-test and post-test scores to see whether the application of the tasks had affected the learners’ WTC and speaking ability. According to the statistical mean scores gained from pre and post test scores, it was found that not only cooperative and paired-work task-based instructions could both enhance the learners' speaking ability, but also their willingness to communicate was increased. Also, independent samples t-test revealed that cooperative task-based instruction is more effective than paired-work task-based instruction on enhancing Iranian EFL learners' willingness to communicate. Teacher and syllabus designers may benefit from the findings of this study. Teachers can develop group works to remove the learners' reluctance to participate in the speaking activities and syllabus designers can also focus on more motivational communicative tasks to enhance the pupils' chance of participation.

Keywords

Cooperative instruction

paired-work instruction

speaking ability

task based language teaching

willingness to communicate

Barron, A. (2003). Acquisition in interlanguage pragmatics: Learning how to do things with

words in a study abroad context. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Press.

Brown, G., and Yule, G. (1983). Teaching the spoken language. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

Brown, H. D. (2002). Principles of language learning and teaching. San Francisco, CA: Addison Wesley Longman.

Cohen, S. & Willis, T. (1985). Stress and social support and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin,98, 310-357.

East, M. (2012). Task-Based language teaching from the teachers’ perspective. Amsterdam:

John Benjamins B.V.

Hedge, T. (2008). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kang, S. -J. (2004). Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System, 33(2), 277-292.

McCroskey, J. C. (1992). Reliability and validity of the willingness to communicate scale. Communication Quarterly, 40, 16-25.

Murad, T. M. (2009). The effect of task-based language teaching on developing speaking skill among the Palestinian secondary EFL students in Israel and their attitudes towards English(unpublished doctoral's dissertation). Yarmouk University. Jordan.

Olsen, R. & Kagan, S. (1992). About cooperative learning. In C, Kessler (Ed.), Cooperative language learning (pp.1-30). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Phipps, W. (1999). Pair work: Interaction in the modern languages classroom. London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research.

Rahimpour, M. (2008). Implementation of task-based approaches to language teaching. Research on Foreign Languages Journal of Faculty of Letters and Humanities, 41, 45- 61.

Ramirez, A. G. (1995). Creating contexts for second language acquisition: Theory and methods. New York: Longman.

Rashtchi, M., & Keyvanfar, A. (2007). ELT: Quick and easy (3^rd Ed.). Tehran: Rahnama.

Roger T. and D. W. Johnson (1998). Cooperative learning. Transforming Education, 18, 30- 36.

Sae-Ong, U. (2010). The use of task-based learning and group work incorporation to develop English speaking ability. Thailand: Shrinakhrinwirot University.

Tarone, E. (2005). Speaking in a second language: Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Tsui, A. B. M. (1995). Introducing classroom interaction. London: Penguin.

Weir, C. J. (1993). Understanding and developing language tests. New York: Prentice Hall.

Woolfolk, A. (2001). Educational psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Yashima, T., Zenuk-Nishide, L. and Shimizu, K. (2004). The influence of attitudes and affect on willingness to communicate and second language communication. Language Learning, 54(1), 119-152.

Zakahi, W.R. & McCroskey, J. C. (1989). Willingness to communicate: A potential confounding variable in communication research. Communication reports, 2, 96-104.