Tapping into Students’ Perception of Source Use in Undergraduate Essay Writing Practices in Applied Linguistics

Bikmohammadi, Mina; Alinasab, Mahsa

doi:10.22034/ijpie.2024.464402.1027

Tapping into Students’ Perception of Source Use in Undergraduate Essay Writing Practices in Applied Linguistics

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Mina Bikmohammadi ¹

Mahsa Alinasab ²

¹ Writing and Professional Communication, East Carolina University, NC, United States

² Assistant professor at English Language and Literature department, Urmia University

10.22034/ijpie.2024.464402.1027

Abstract

Source use in writing, commonly known as integrated writing, involves drawing insights from listening or reading input to compose a text. Such source-informed writing has gained ground in L2 writing instruction and assessment. However, the extent L2 learners find integrated tasks effective in promoting their writing ability has been rarely touched upon. In addition, research should consider students’ needs and perspectives when it comes to the differences between integrated tasks and traditional independent writing practices in satisfying their writing requirements. In this paper, we report on the attitudes of non-Anglophone undergraduate students toward the incorporation of integrated writing tasks as part of essay writing classes and whether they perceive these tasks as effective compared to default independent practices without source use. A researcher-made self-report scale consisting of 44 items on integrated and independent writing tasks was distributed among undergraduate students following their participation in an integrated essay writing program and a regular undergraduate writing course at the university. We interviewed 15 participants to gain further insights into their attitudes toward source use in writing classes. We found that non-Anglophone students significantly favored the inclusion of integrated tasks in their classes. However, they hold fairly positive attitudes toward independent writing tasks, as our interview analysis disclosed. We think that source use could be integrally integrated into L2 writing classes, which seems proportionate to students’ needs in non-English settings.

Keywords

Attitudes

Integrated Writing

Non-anglophone

Undergraduate Writing

Subjects

Teaching Methodology

Ansas, V. N., & Sukyadi, D. (2019). source-based writing among undergraduate students: perspective and challenges. International Journal of Education, 11(2), 152. doi:10.17509/ije.v11i2.14757.

Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press.

Cumming, A., Grant, L., Mulcahy-Ernt, P., & Powers, D. E. (2004). A teacher-verification study of speaking and writing prototype tasks for a new TOEFL. Language Testing, 21(2), 107–145. doi:10.1191/0265532204lt278oa

Cumming, A., Kantor, R., Baba, K., Erdosy, U., Eouanzoui, K., & James, M. (2005). Differences in written discourse in independent and integrated prototype tasks for next generation TOEFL. Assessing Writing, 10(1), 5–43. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2005.02.001

Cumming, A., Kantor, R., Powers, D., Santos, T., & Taylor, C. (2000). TOEFL 2000 writing framework. Educational Testing Service.

Ebrahimi, S. F., & Mallaki, A. (2024). The Pronoun “this” in Civil Engineering Research Articles. International Journal of Practical and Pedagogical Issues in English Education, 2(2), 1-12.

Feak, C., & Dobson, B. (1996). Building on the Impromptu: A Source-Based Academic Writing Assessment. College ESL, 6(1), 73-84.

Fox, J. (2004). Test decisions over time: tracking validity. Language Testing, 21(4), 437–465. doi:10.1191/0265532204lt292oa

Fox, J. D. (2003). From Products to Process: An Ecological Approach to Bias Detection. International Journal of Testing, 3(1), 21–47. doi:10.1207/s15327574ijt0301_2

Gebril, A. (2009). Score generalizability of academic writing tasks: Does one test method fit it all. Language Testing, 26(4), 507–531. doi:10.1177/0265532209340188

Gebril, A. (2010). Bringing reading-to-write and writing-only assessment tasks together: A generalizability analysis. Assessing Writing, 15(2), 100–117. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.05.002

Gebril, A., & Plakans, L. (2016). Source-based tasks in academic writing assessment: Lexical diversity, textual borrowing and proficiency. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 24, 78–88. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2016.10.001

Gholami, J., & Alinasab, M. (2017). Source-Based Tasks in Writing Independent and Integrated Essays. International Journal of Instruction, 10(3), 127–142. doi:10.12973/iji.2017.1039a

Guo, L. (2011). Product and process in TOEFL iBT independent and integrated writing tasks: A validation study. A published dissertation. Georgia State University

Guo, L., Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2013). Predicting human judgments of essay quality in both integrated and independent second language writing samples: A comparison study. Assessing Writing, 18(3), 218–238. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.05.002

Hirvela, A., & Du, Q. (2013). Why am I paraphrasing?: Undergraduate ESL writers’ engagement with source-based academic writing and reading. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(2), 87-98. doi: 10.1016/ j. jeap. 2012. 11. 005

Keck, C. (2014). Copying, paraphrasing, and academic writing development: A re-examination of L1 and L2 summarization practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, 25, 4–22. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2014.05.005

Knoch, U., & Sitajalabhorn, W. (2013). A closer look at integrated writing tasks: Towards a more focussed definition for assessment purposes. Assessing Writing, 18(4), 300–308. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.09.003

Leki, I., & Carson, J. (1994). Students’ perceptions of EAP writing instruction and writing needs across the discipline. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 81-101

Li, Y., & Casanave, P. C. (2012). Two first year students’ strategies for writing from sources: Patch-writing or plagiarism? Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(2), 165-180. doi: 10.1016/ j. jslw. 2012. 03. 002

Payant, C., McDonough, K., Uludag, P., & Lindberg, R. (2019). Predicting integrated writing task performance: Source comprehension, prewriting planning, and individual differences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 40, 87–97. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2019.06.001

Plakans, L. (2008). Comparing composing processes in writing-only and reading-to-write test tasks. Assessing Writing, 13(2), 111–129. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.07.001

Plakans, L. (2009a). The role of reading strategies in integrated L2 writing tasks. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(2), 252-266. doi: 10.1016/ j. jeap. 2009.05. 001

Plakans, L. (2009b). Discourse synthesis in integrated second language writing assessment. Language Testing, 26(11), 561-587. doi: 10.1177/ 0265532209340192

Plakans, L., & Gebril, A. (2012). A close investigation into source use in integrated second language writing tasks. Assessing Writing, 17(1), 18–34. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.09.002

Plakans, L., & Gebril, A. (2013). Using multiple texts in an integrated writing assessment: Source text use as a predictor of score. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 217–230. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2013.02.003

Read, J. (1990). Providing relevant content in an EAP writing test. English for Specific Purposes, 9(2), 109–121. doi:10.1016/0889-4906(90)90002-t

Su, Y.-C. (2007). Students’ changing views and the integrated-skills approach in taiwan’s efl college classes. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8(1), 27–40. doi:10.1007/bf03025831

Upshur, J. A., & Turner, C. E. (1999). Systematic effects in the rating of second-language speaking ability: test method and learner discourse. Language Testing, 16(1), 82–111.doi:10.1177/026553229901600105

Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge University Press.

Weigle, S. C. (2004). Integrating reading and writing in a competency test for non-native speakers of English. Assessing Writing, 9(1), 27–55. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2004.01.002

Weigle, S. C., & Parker, K. (2012). Source text borrowing in an integrated reading/writing assessment. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(2), 118–133. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2012.03.004

Yang, H. C. (2009). Exploring the complexity of second language writers’ strategy use and performance on an integrated writing test through structural equation modeling and qualitative approaches. The University of Texas at Austin. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation)

Yang, H.-C., & Plakans, L. (2012). Second Language Writers’ Strategy Use and Performance on an Integrated Reading-Listening-Writing Task. TESOL Quarterly, 46(1), 80–103. doi:10.1002/tesq.6