International Journal of Practical and Pedagogical Issues in English Education

International Journal of Practical and Pedagogical Issues in English Education

On the Plausibility of Integrating Synthetic vs. Analytic Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Powered Academic Writing Tasks into Iranian EFL Classrooms: State-of-the-Art

Document Type : Original Article

Author
Department of English, Shahr-e-Qods Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Concerning the rapid permeating trend of technologies into education realm, teachers and stake holders are to make the most of new approaches and lead EFL learners in the right path to have the best uptake possible from the teaching/learning innovations. The Artificial Intelligence (AI) has accelerated such rapid growth to a considerable large extent. The present study aimed to delve into the permeating AI-integrated applications into Iranian EFL teaching/learning realm to ascertain the enrichment of academic writing ability and skill acquisition. Needless to indicate that these AI-tools are considered as boosters for the amateur writers and the advance professional writers rarely do they need them. To conduct the study, an Oxford English language proficiency test was administered and three groups of 20 intermediate Iranian EFL undergraduates majoring at English translation discipline were selected and randomly assigned. They got prepared to attend a course of writing five-paragraph essay. The conventional method was practiced for the control group and other two experimental groups experienced the Synthetic and the Analytic AI tools. The design of this study was quantitative quasi-experimental pre-test post-test. The pre- and post-test was an academic writing task. Surprisingly, the experimental Synthetic AI outperformed Analytic AI group, and the experimental ones scores were higher and statistically significant than control group. It confirmed that applying AI tools in skill acquisition could significantly enhance the enrichment of obtaining boosted knowledge process and competence. The results obtained through this study might be useful and practicable for EFL teachers, materials developers and stake holders.
Keywords

Subjects


Alamer, A., & Al Khateeb, A. (2021). Effects of using the WhatsApp application on language learners motivation: a controlled investigation using structural equation modeling. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1903042
AliSalimi, E., & Karimabadi, M. (2021). The Efficacy of Classroom Flipping on Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners’ Engagement and their Perception of the Flipped Classroom Model. Journal of Teaching Language Skills. JTLS. 39 (3) 143-180. DOI:10.22099/jtls.2021.38824.2901
Alsied, S. M., & Ibrahim, N. W. (2017). Exploring challenges encountered by EFL Libyan learners in research teaching and writing. IAFOR Journal of Language Learning, 3(2), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.22492/ijll.3.2.06
Atasoy, A., & Temizkan, M. (2016). Evaluation of secondary school students’ writing fluency skills. Retrieved 18 March 2020.
Pari, M. (2024). Artificial Intelligence (AI) Presentation Assistants: Current Trends, Experiences, and Future Directions for Language Pedagogy. International Journal of Practical and Pedagogical Issues in English Education2(3), 54-66. doi: 10.22034/ijpie.2024.469410.1030
Bowen, N. E. J. A., and Thomas, N. (2022). Self-regulated learning and knowledge blindness: bringing language into view. Appl. Linguis. 43, 1207–1216. doi: 10.1093/applin/amac062
Coenen, A., Davis, L., Ippolito, D., Reif, E., & Yuan, A. (2021). Wordcraft: A human-AI collaborative editor for story writing. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.07430
Cong-Lem, N., & Daneshfar, S. (2024). Generative AI and Second/Foreign Language Education from Vygotsky’s Cultural-Historical Perspective. In: Bui, H.P., Namaziandost, E. (eds) Innovations in Technologies for Language Teaching and Learning. Studies in Computational Intelligence, Vol 1159. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-63447-5_10 
Cotton, D.R., Cotton, P.A., & Shipway, J.R.,(2023). Chatting and Cheating: Ensuring Academic Integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int. 61, 11-12.
Currie, G. M. (2023). Academic integrity and artificial intelligence: Is ChatGPT hype, hero or heresy? Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, 53(5), 719–730. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.04.008
Farrokhnia M., Banihashem S.K., Noroozi O., & Wals A. (2023). ASWOT analysis of ChatGPT: implication for educational practice and research. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int., 1-15. Doi:10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846
Fattah, Z. (2024). The Effect of Portfolio Assessment on Iranian EFL Learners’ Writing Ability. International Journal of Practical and pedagogical Issues in English Education,2 (2),13-34. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijpie.2024.198471
Finn, H. B. (2018). Articulating struggle: ESL students’ perceived obstacles to success in a community college writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 42, 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.09.001
Flowerdew, J. (2019). The linguistic disadvantage of scholars who write in English as an additional language: Myth or reality. Language Teaching, 52(2), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000041
Gayed, J. M., Carlon, M. K. J., Oriola, A. M., & Cross, J. S. (2022). Exploring an AI-based writing assistant's impact on English language learners. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, p. 100055. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100055. 
Geiser, S., & Studley, R. (2001). Relative contribution of high school grades, SAT I and SAT II scores in predicting success at UC: Preliminary findings [Unpublished manuscript]. University of California.
Hamzaoui, C. (2021). Scrutinizing Algerian EFL students’ challenges in research teaching and writing. Hungarian Educational Research Journal, 11(4), 478–488. https://doi.org/10.1556/063.2021.00047
Hanauer, D. I., Sheridan, C. L., & Englander, K. (2019). Linguistic injustice in the writing of research articles in English as a second language: Data from Taiwanese and Mexican researchers.  Written Communication, 36(1), 136–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088318804821
Harunasari, S. Y., & Halim,  N. (2019). Digital Backchannel: Promoting Students’ Engagement in EFL Large Class. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET),  14(07), pp. 163–178. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i07.9128
Jones, C. (2020). What is fluency, and how can it be taught? World of Better Learning. https://www.cambridge.org/elt/blog/2020/01/22/fluency-can-it-be-taught/
Jowarder, M. I. (2023). The influence of ChatGPT on social science students: Insights drawn from undergraduate students in the United States. Indonesian Journal of Innovation and Applied Sciences, 3(2), 194–200. https://doi.org/10.47540/ijias.v3i2.878
Karyuatry, L. (2018). Grammarly as a tool to improve students’ writing quality: Free online-proofreader across the boundaries. JSSH (Jurnal Sains Sosial dan Humaniora), 2(1), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.30595/jssh.v2i1.2297
Kessler, M. (2023). Supplementing mobile-assisted language learning with reflective journal writing: a case study of Duolingo users’ metacognitive awareness. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. 36, 1040–1063. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2021.1968914
Kim. N.Y., (2019). A study on the use of artificial intelligence chatbots for improving English grammar skills. Journal of Digital Convergence. 17(8): 37–46.
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2019). Mobile Language Learning Innovation Inspired by Migrants. Journal of Learning For Development, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v6i2.349
Lahuerta, A. (2017). Analysis of accuracy in the writing of EFL Students enrolled on CLIL and Non-CLIL programmes: The impact of grade and gender. The Language Learning Journal, 48(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2017.1303745
Li, Z., & Bonk, C. J. (2023). Self-directed language learning with Duolingo in an out-of-class context. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. 39, 1–19. doi: 10.1111/jcal.12730
Lin, L. H. F., & Morrison, B. (2021). Challenges in academic writing: Perspectives of engineering faculty and L2 postgraduate research students. English for Specific Purposes, 63, 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.03.004
Loos, E., & Radicke, J. (2024). Using ChatGPT-3 as a Writing Tool: An Educational Assistant or Moral Hazard? Current ChatGPT-3 Media Representations Compared to Plato’s Critical Stance on Writing in Phaedrus. AI Ethics. Https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00470-1
McCarthy, J., Minsky, M. L., Rochester, N., & Shannon, C. E. (2006). A proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on artificial intelligence, August 31, 1955. AI Magazine, 27(4), 12–14. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v27i4.1904
McDonough, K., & Crawford, W. J. (2018). Identifying effective writing tasks for use in EFL write-to-learn language contexts. The Language Learning Journal, 48(4), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2018.1465990
Mirzamohammadi, B. (2024). The Effects of Using Process Genre Approach on Writing Skill Development in ESP Classes: A case of Business Students. International Journal of Practical and pedagogical Issues in English Education,2 (1),13-23. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijpie.2024.192902
Moghimi, L. &Mirzaei, S. (2024). Comparing Writing Outcomes in Online and In-Person EFL Instruction for Intermediate Male and Female Students. International Journal of Practical and pedagogical Issues in English Education,2 (1),24-37. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijpie.2024.192903
Moussalli, S., & Cardoso, W. (2020). Intelligent personal assistants: Can they understand and be understood by accented L2 learners? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(8), 865–890. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1595664
Nejati, E., Jahangiri, A., & Salehi, M. R. (2018). The effect of using computer-assisted language learning (CALL) on Iranian EFL learners' vocabulary learning: An experimental study. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 13(2), 351– 362. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v13i2.752 
Nobles, S., & Paganucci, L. (2015). Do digital writing tools deliver? Student perceptions of writing quality using digital tools and online writing environments. Computers and Composition, 38, 16–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2015.09.001
Phuong, W. T. N. (2021). Difficulties in studying writing of English-majored sophomores at a university in Vietnam. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(10), 313–330. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v8i10.3962
Rad, H. S., Alipour, R., & Jafarpour,  A. (2023). Using artificial intelligence to foster students’ writing feedback literacy, engagement, and outcome: A case of Wordtune application.  Interactive Learning Environments, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2208170
Rahimi, M., Zhang, L.J., (2018). Writing task complexity, students’ motivational beliefs, anxiety and their writing production in English as a second language. Read. Writ. 32 (3), 761- 786.
Rouhani, Y., Nafchi, A., & Ziaee, S. (2016). Applying Different Interventions to Teach Writing to Students with Disabilities: A Review Study. Theory And Practice In Language Studies, 6(4), 733. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0604.10
Ruscetti, T., Krueger, K., & Sabatier, C. (2018). Improving quantitative writing one sentence at a time. PLoS One, 13(9),  e0203109. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203109
Safadi, H. A., Shgair, M. S. A., and Qatawnih, K. S. (2022). The effectiveness of designing e-learning environment based on mastery learning and artificial intelligence on developing English speaking skills among tenth graders in Palestine. J. Educ. Psychol. Sci. 31, 475–507. doi: 10.33976/IUGJEPS.31.1/2023/22
Singh, H., Tayarani-Najaran, M.-H., & Yaqoob, M. (2023). Exploring computer science students’ perception of ChatGPT in higher education: A descriptive and correlation study. Education Science, 13(9), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090924
Singh, M. K. M. (2017). International EFL/ESL master students’ adaptation strategies for academic writing practices at tertiary level. Journal of International Students, 7(3), 620–643. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.570025
Suh, A., & Prophet, J. (2018). The state of immersive technology research: A literature analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.019
Tavakoli, P., Nakatsuhara, F., & Hunter, A. (2020).  Aspects of Fluency Across Assessed Levels of Speaking Proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 104(1), 169-191. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12620
Van Waes, L., & Leijten, M. (2015). Fluency in writing: A multidimensional perspective on writing fluency applied to L1 and L2. Computers and Composition, 38, 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compc om.2015.09.012
Wang, N., Chen, J., & Zhang, J. (2021) Developing and integrating constructive CALL courseware for EAP in Chinese universities: a report on a case study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, (Online Published 25-March-2021)  DOI:10.1080/09588221.2021.1895226
Williams, M., Tang, K., & Won, M. (2019). ELL’s science meaning making in multimodal inquiry: A case-study in a Hong Kong bilingual school. Asia-Pacific Science Education,  5(3), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0031-1
Zhao, X. (2022). Leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) technology for English writing: Introducing Wordtune as a digital writing assistant for EFL writers. RELC Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221094089
Zheng, B., & Warschauer, M. (2017). Epilogue: Second language writing in the age of computer-mediated communication. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.014 
Zhou, S. A., & Hiver, P. (2022). The effect of self-regulated writing strategies on students’ L2 writing engagement and disengagement behaviors. System, 106, 102768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102768
Zimmerman, A., (2023). A ghostwriter for the masses: ChatGPT and the future of writing. Annals for Surgical Oncology. 30, 3170-3173
Volume 2, Issue 4
Autumn 2024
Pages 54-75

  • Receive Date 08 September 2024
  • Revise Date 06 November 2024
  • Accept Date 11 December 2024