International Journal of Practical and Pedagogical Issues in English Education

International Journal of Practical and Pedagogical Issues in English Education

Impoliteness and Persuasion in Greta Thunberg's Public Speeches on Climate Change

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 English department, Faculty of Humanities, Urmia Brach, Islamic Azad University, Iran
2 Institute of Languages, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
3 Faculty of Languages and Linguistics, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
4 Department of Education, Faculty of Social Sciences and Liberal Arts, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
5 Department of Mass Communication, Faculty of Social Sciences and Liberal Arts, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Abstract
The present paper examines the impoliteness strategies in Greta Thunberg's public speeches on climate change and their role in persuasive communication. Employing an integrated framework of Culpeper's Impoliteness Strategies and Aristotle's Rhetorical Appeals, we qualitatively analyzed twelve speeches. The findings indicate that bald on-record impoliteness is the dominant strategy, used to express frustration and deliver direct criticism toward politicians and adults. This straightforwardness constructs ethos by projecting a persona of bold truth-telling. Furthermore, negative impoliteness, which expresses disappointment with the indifference of older generations, cultivates pathos by aligning with the perspective of youth and fostering a shared emotional response. Similarly, the use of sarcasm to mock politicians enhances pathos by provoking audience indignation at perceived incompetence. Finally, positive impoliteness, manifested through direct disagreement, underscores her use of logos by pinpointing logical flaws in policymakers' positions. Overall, this study substantiates the persuasive power of impoliteness in public oratory. It offers new insights into how strategic face-threatening acts can generate persuasive discourse capable of mobilizing action towards climate action.
Keywords

Subjects


Alemi, M., & Latifi, M. (2019). The realization of impoliteness in arguments between the Democrats and Republicans over the government shutdown issue in the US. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 23(1), 83–97.
Andersson, M. (2021). The climate of climate change: Impoliteness as a hallmark of homophily in YouTube comment threads on Greta Thunberg's environmental activism. Journal of Pragmatics, 178, 93–107.
Bangstad, S., & Helland, F. (2019). The rhetoric of Islamophobia: An analysis of the means of persuasion in Hege Storhaug's writings on Islam and Muslims. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 42(13), 2229–2247.
Baumlin, J. S., & Meyer, C. A. (2018). Positioning ethos in/for the twenty-first century: An introduction to histories of ethos. Humanities, 7(3), 78.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1997). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
Bousfield, D. (2008). Impoliteness in interaction. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Bustan, E. S., & Alakrash, H. M. (2020). An analysis of impoliteness strategies performed by Donald Trump tweets addressing the middle east countries. Global Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 1, 66–74.
Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25(3), 349–367.
Culpeper, J. (2005). Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The Weakest Link. Journal of Politeness Research, 1(1), 35–72.
Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge University Press.
Hakoköngäs, E., Halmesvaara, O., & Sakki, I. (2020). Persuasion through bitter humor: Multimodal discourse analysis of rhetoric in internet memes of two far-right groups in Finland. Social Media and  Society, 6(2).
Khajavi, Y., & Rasti, A. (2020). A discourse analytic investigation into politicians' use of rhetorical and persuasive strategies: The case of US election speeches. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 7(1).
Kramer, D. (2021). *Greta Thunberg: Who is the climate campaigner and what are her aims? BBC News.
Krishnan, I., Amutan, K. I., Teoh, M. L., Hee, S. C., Ramalingam, S., & Maruthai, E. (2020). Using rhetorical approach of Ethos, pathos and logos by Malaysian engineering students in persuasive email writings. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(4), 19–33.
Lakoff, R. T. (1989). The limits of politeness: Therapeutic and courtroom discourse. Multilingua, 8(2-3), 101–129.
Landau, J., & Keeley-Jonker, C. (2018). Conductor of public feelings: An affective-emotional rhetorical analysis of Obama's national eulogy in Tucson. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 104(2), 166–188.
Mautner, G. (2017). Discourse and management: Critical perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan.
May, S. (2017). What is climate change? NASA.
McCambridge, L. (2022). Describing the voice of online bullying: An analysis of stance and voice type in YouTube comments. Discourse, Context and Media, 45, 1–10.
Meyer, R. (2019). Why Greta makes adults uncomfortable. The Atlantic.
Muazzaro, V., & Dewanti, A. (2020). Impoliteness strategies in Donald Trump's speech. PalArch's. Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(4), 100–110.
Ottesen, K. K. (2021). Greta Thunberg on the state of the climate movement and the roots of her power as an activist. The Washington Post.
Park, C. S., Liu, Q., & Kaye, B. K. (2021). Analysis of ageism, sexism, and ableism in user comments on YouTube videos about climate activist Greta Thunberg. Social Media and Society, 7(3).
Parrish, A. C. (2013). Adaptive rhetoric: Evolution, culture, and the art of persuasion. Routledge.
Penz, H. (2022). Communicating climate change: How (not) to touch a cord with people and promote action. Text and Talk, 42(4), 571–590.
Poggi, I. (2005). The goals of persuasion. Pragmatics & Cognition, 13(2), 297–335.
Saeed, U., Aslam, M. Z., Khan, A., Khan, M., Atiq, M., & Bhatti, H. (2020). Rhetorical and persuasive strategies employed by Imran Khan in his victory speech: A socio-political discourse analysis. International Journal of English Linguistics, 10(2), 349–356.
Varpio, L. (2018). Using rhetorical appeals to credibility, logic, and emotions to increase your persuasiveness. Perspectives on Medical Education, 7(3), 207–210.
Zohrabi, M. (2013). Mixed method research: Instruments, validity, reliability and reporting findings. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(2), 254-262.
Volume 4, Issue 1
Winter 2026
Pages 111-127

  • Receive Date 27 October 2025
  • Revise Date 19 December 2025
  • Accept Date 02 February 2026