The Effect of Length Constraint on Task-Based L2 Narrative Retellings: A Study of EFL Learners' CALF Performance

Yaghoubi-Notash, Massoud; Behtary, Shahabaddin; Gobadi, Sina; Shahbazi Mojarrad, Shiva

doi:10.22034/ijpie.2025.513753.1094

The Effect of Length Constraint on Task-Based L2 Narrative Retellings: A Study of EFL Learners' CALF Performance

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Massoud Yaghoubi-Notash ¹

Shahabaddin Behtary ²

Sina Gobadi ³

Shiva Shahbazi Mojarrad ⁴

¹ English Language and Literature, Faculty of Persian Literature and Foreign Languages, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

² Department of English, Ardabil Campus, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran.

³ Self-employed Researcher, Ardabil, Iran

⁴ Freelance Researcher, Ardabil Iran

10.22034/ijpie.2025.513753.1094

Abstract

Task as a promising area of study has contributed to a wealth of the literature in the field of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) over the years. Length constraint as task demand is one of the under-investigated areas of task performance. It refers to the restriction placed on the amount of spoken content, encouraging brevity and conciseness. For the purpose of the study, 23 EFL university students (10 male and 13 female) participated in the study. Adopting a within-subjects design, an oral reproduction text was chosen as an instrument in the form of a narrative retelling task to compare the participants task-prompted complexity, accuracy, lexis and fluency across length-constrained and non-length-constraint performances. MANOVA results revealed that length constraint as the independent variable influenced EFL learners’ narrative retellings when the four dependent variables of complexity, accuracy, lexis and fluency were taken together. However, length constraint was shown to have variable effect on the aspects of retelling performance. Positive significant differences were obtained regarding promoting accuracy and fluency, but not about complexity and lexis. Implications of the study are discussed in the light of theoretical and empirical claims in the literature.

Keywords

length

length constraint

narrative retellings

task, variability

Subjects

Teaching Methodology

Adams, R., & Nik, N. M. (2014). Prior knowledge and second language task production in text chat. System, 42, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.10.011

Ahmadian, M. J., & Tavakoli, M. (2021). The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, complexity, and fluency in EFL learners’ oral production. Language Teaching Research, 25(3), 382-404. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819858249

Awwad, A. A., & Tavakoli, P. (2019). Task complexity, language proficiency and working memory: Interaction effects on second language speech performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 60(2), 169-196. DOI: 10.1515/iral.2018.0378

Behtary, S., & Yaghoubi-Notash, M. (2009). Explorations in L2 Speech Variability: A case for length constraint as task demand. Rassegna Italiana di Linguistica Applicata, 41(3), 191-206.

De Jong, N., & Perfetti, C. A. (2021). Fluency training in the ESL classroom: An experimental study of fluency development and proceduralization. Language Learning, 61(2), 533-568. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00620.x

Divsar, H. (2020). The comparative effect of rehearsal, strategic, and online planning on the fluency, accuracy, complexity, lexical variety, and attentional allocation of EFL learners’ argumentative writing. Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (TESLQ), 41(2), 75-111. DOI: 10.22099/TESL.2021.41004.3017

Divsar, H. (2022). The impact of planning time types on complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexical diversity in EFL learners’ writing. Language Teaching Research, 26(1), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820906287

Ellis, R. (2018). Reflections on task-based language teaching. Multilingual Matters.

Ellis, R. (2024). Rod Ellis’s essential bookshelf: Focus on form. Language Teaching, 57, 246–261 doi:10.1017/S026144482200012X

Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C. (Eds.). (2020). Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781108643689

Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second language acquisition, 18(3), 299-323.

Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1999). The influence of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance. Language teaching research, 3(3), 215-247.

Foster, P., & Wigglesworth, G. (2016). Capturing accuracy in second language performance: The case for a weighted clause ratio. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 98-116.

García-Ponce, E. E., Mora-Pablo, I., & Segovia-Hernández, J. G. (2022). Role of EFL learners’ perceptions of task difficulty in complexity, accuracy and fluency: An exploratory case study. Porta Linguarum, 37, 123-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi37.15855

Hsu, H. (2023). Lexical diversity in constrained vs. unconstrained L2 narrative tasks. TESOL Quarterly, 57(1), 78-102. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.312

Jackson, D. O., & Suethanapornkul, S. (2023). Time pressure and L2 oral performance: A trade-off between complexity and accuracy. Language Learning, 73(1), 45-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12512

Jin, T., Lu, X., & Ni, J. (2020). Attentional allocation in L2 task-based performance: A cognitive load perspective. Applied Linguistics, 41(5), 712-735. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz046

Kormos, J., & Trebits, A. (2022). Task modality and pair formation method in L2 oral interaction. Language Teaching Research, 26(4), 567-589. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820906288

Kuiken, F., Mos, M., & Vedder, I. (2005). Cognitive Task Complexity and Second Language Writing Performance. EUROSLA Yearbook, 5, 195-222. DOI: 10.1075/eurosla.5.10kui

Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2007). Task complexity and measures of linguistic performance in L2 writing. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 45(3), 261-284. DOI: 10.1515/iral.2007.012

Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2012). Syntactic complexity, lexical variation and accuracy as a function of task complexity and proﬁciency level in L2 writing and speaking. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.) Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 143-170). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.32.07kui

Lambert, C., & Kormos, J. (2024). Dynamic systems and task complexity: A longitudinal study of L2 performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 46(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226312300045X

Luo, S. (2022). Task complexity and L2 performance: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 72(1), 152-183. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12472

Malvern, D., & Richards, B. (2002). Investigating accommodation in language proficiency interviews using a new measure of lexical diversity. Language testing, 19(1), 85-104.

Mehnert, U. (1998). The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in second language acquisition, 20(1), 83-108.

Michel, M. C., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2007). The influence of complexity in monologic versus dialogic tasks in Dutch L2. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 45(3), 241-259. DOI: 10.1515/iral.2007.011

Michel, M., & Kormos, J. (2023). Working memory and task conditions in L2 speech production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 44(2), 301-328. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716422000425

Readable.com (2025). What is readability? Retrieved July 30, 2025, from https://readable.com/readability/what-is-readability/

Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework (p. 3). Applied linguistics, 22(1), 27-57.

Robinson, P. (2007). Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: Effects on L2 speech production, interaction, uptake and perceptions of task difficulty International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 45(3), 193-213. DOI: 10.1515/iral.2007.009

Robinson, P. (Ed.). (2011). Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (Vol. 2). John Benjamins Publishing.

Saito, K., & Hanzawa, K. (2022). Working memory and L2 oral fluency under time pressure. Language Learning, 72(3), 789-820. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12498

Sasayama, S. (2016). Is a ‘Complex’ Task Really Complex? Validating the Assumption of Cognitive Task Complexity. The Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 231-254. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12313

Sasayama, S., & Malicka, A. (2022). The role of task complexity in L2 performance: A meta-analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 56(2), 341-369. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.307

Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied linguistics, 30(4), 510-532.

Skehan, P. (2014). Task-based performance and task-based instruction: Research contributions.

Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings (p. 4). Language learning, 49(1), 93-120.

Suzuki, Y., & Sunada, M. (2023). Fluency development through task repetition: The role of working memory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 45(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263122000362

Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. Input in second language acquisition, 15, 165-179.

Tavakoli, P., & Foster, P. (2021). Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on learner output. Language Learning, 71(1), 75-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12425

Tavakoli, P., & Hunter, A. M. (2018). Is fluency being ‘neglected ‘in the classroom? Teacher understanding of fluency and related classroom practices. Language Teaching Research, 22(3), 330-349.

Tavakoli, P., Nakatsuhara, F., & Hunter, A. M. (2017). Validating speaking test rating scales through microanalysis of fluency using PRAAT.

Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P. (2005). Strategic planning, task structure and performance testing. In Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 239-273). John Benjamins.

Van den Branden, K. (Ed.). (2006a). Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511667282

Van den Branden, K. (2006b). Introduction: Task-based language teaching in a nutshell. In K. Van den Branden (Ed.), Task-based language education: From theory to practice (pp. 1-16). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511667282

Vasylets, O., Gilabert, R., & Manchón, M. M. (2017). The Effects of mode and task complexity on second language production. Language Learning, 67(2), 394-430. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12228

Wang, Z. (2013). The effects of task complexity on L2 lexical complexity. Modern Language Journal, 97(1), 82-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.01431.x

Wiggleworth, G. (2001). Influences on performance in task-based oral assessments. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 186-209). Longman. Xing, M. (2019). Task complexity and second language production: A meta-analysis. System, 84, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.05.003

Zohrabi, M., & Hasanpour, S. (2020). The effect of open vs. closed tasks on Improving Iranian EFL learners’ oral performance. Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (TSOLQ), 38(4), 205-238. https://doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2020.37075.2814